Henry A. Wallace Questions the 'Get Tough' PolicyAndrei Vishinsky's Essay

Henry A. Wallace Questions the 'Get Tough' PolicyAndrei Vishinsky's United Nations Speech - Essay Example Henry A Wallace â€Å"Questions the Get Tough Policy† The main issue revolving around the mind of Henry Wallace was how the rest of the world views the USA following their day-to-day actions. The reading expounds on the international politics of 1940s. Some of the actions that cause concern are $13 billion budget for the war and Navy Departments, continuing examinations and manufacturing of bombs, the plan to arm the Latin America among other military plans in manufacturing the B-29s and the B-36s. These plans and actions make the USA look as if it is paying so much to earn peace. They may also look as if the US is planning to intimidate the rest of the world or it is planning for an inevitable war. Truly, the best way to enhance peace is investing in arms as this will build a predominance force. However, the USA is doing a lot as far as getting prepared for a war is concerned. Henry Wallace explains these actions of Atomic bomb investment as a cheap warfare as compared with t he outdated wars. This is in reference with the fact that there are a few nations with the capacity to produce the weapon. The production process also requires little labor force and the plant itself occupy a small area as compared to the space occupied by plants manufacturing old rifles. Another reason for investment in atomic bombs is that having many bombs among other nations is of no benefit because they would be of benefit just as having enough weapons would do. Another key reason why the country is producing atomic bombs is that the production will kill the monopoly that a nation such as Russia is producing the weapon. This is through a neutralization effect. He also argues that they are producing the atomic bombs to show preparedness for war, as they are the most venerable nation following the fact that they are the wealthiest nation in the world (Baylis, Smith, and Owens 23). He refers to a philosophy in military studies, which states that there is no nation capable of winni ng a war that fully destroys modern civilization. The theory, therefore, advocates that the best preventative measure is attacking nations, which produce the weapon. The theory by its nature is unethical and immoral. The USA may be at a fix if it decided to apply the theory because if it attempts to attack Russia and all its atomic reserves, it will awaken Europe, meaning in has to destroy it as well which it would be an immense challenge. There are also issues concerning distrust of Russia by the Americans. This is following the conflicts between the two nations as far as political and economic power is concerned. However, there is also an argument that the continuing thought regarding distrust for Russia will not do the world any good because of their reaction concerning the allegation. This is in reference with the history of the nation as well as the policies of Russia to the rest of the world. Following the argument by Henry Wallace, it is evident that the Americans feel that t hey are exceptional and superior to other nations (Baylis, Smith, and Owens 56). Andrei Vishinsky's â€Å"United Nations Speech" â€Å"The Get Policy† by Henry Wallace of 1947 analyzes the need to stop the ongoing after- war propaganda that negatively affected the people. Different individuals share their own opinion about the war, and this is published in the newspapers and daily